Exegesis Volume 07 Issue #080

In This Issue:

From: "Jan Sar"
Subject: [e] Re: exegesis Digest V7 #79

Exegesis Digest Wed, 11 Sep 2002

From: "Jan Sar"
Subject: [e] Re: exegesis Digest V7 #79
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:39:54 +0000

Patrice Guinard wrote: We all know this, Jan. Mid-points are another manner to use aspects, a kind of substitute. The problem is there are no definite MEANINGS in astrology. Astrologers believe that. Have a look at the Ebertin cookbook, "The Combination of stellar influences": nothing else in the "interpretations" that were not known by classical aspects.

Just a word from Jan: …not necessary. A large number of astrologers have no idea what midpoints are… …and there is a difference between believe and assumption. Try to develop any idea without some kind of assumptions. …with all respect to work of Ebertin – it is out of date. …and one thing more: planets are planets; interpretation is changing according to a time and a place. Do you prefer imaginary works (ex. Chiron?)

Canada - 1238 Premier St., North Vancouver, BC, V7J-2H4 tel: (604) 987-6237 Poland - ul. Lubicz32/8, 31-512 Krakow, tel: (012) 431-1036

_________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


End of exegesis Digest V7 #80

[Exegesis Top][Table of Contents][Prior Issue][Next Issue]

Unless otherwise indicated, articles and submissions above are copyright © 1996-2003 their respective authors.